Climate: Real problem, false solutions. No.3: REDD+ [1]
Published on Wednesday, 02 December 2015 20:37
TO SOLVE THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS, MULTINATIONALS ARE SUGGESTING FALSE
SOLUTIONS. FAR FROM SOLVING THE PROBLEM THEY ARE CONTRIBUTING WITH THEIR
SHARE OF DAMAGES. THIS ARTICLE IS THE 3RD IN A SERIES OF FIVE TO APPEAR
THIS WEEK.
[2]_3/ REDD+_
"Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation" a very
worthwhile aim, and a + too which is the icing on the cake! The system
is simple: the country (or local population, associations etc.) owning
any substantial resources located within forests assesses the financial
loss of not carrying out deforestation and the quantity of carbon that
will therefore not be introduced into the atmosphere. Then
industrialised countries (or collectives, NGOs, multinationals etc.) pay
these forested nations to avert the destruction of their forests. In
exchange for their forest saving investment, they are offered a means of
offsetting their emissions and/ or carbon credits. A fair deal then! And
the + is for when we're also talking about the enhancement of carbon
stocks, sustainable forest management and forest conservation.
_ Really?_
On closer inspection it becomes clear that REDD+ serves as little more
than the means of concealing the negotiated disappearance of forests
that occurs during a COP, instead of anyone posing the question of how
greenhouse gases resulting from the use of fossil fuels can be
effectively reduced.
This covers no more than potential deforestation, and therefore nothing
concrete. In contrast, the carbon credits on offer are very real indeed,
and represent a license to emit greenhouse gases at will. Furthermore,
peasant populations who call these forested areas home, often find
themselves obliged to reduce their food production in order to plant
trees, thereby reducing their food sovereignty. Conservation agreements
can also result in their loss of access to areas routinely used for the
harvesting of plants, hunting or shifting cultivation.
Now climate negotiations are examining the possibility of making
agricultural land eligible for these carbon offsetting systems and
compensation. This would be an open door for land grabs by
multinationals eager to secure opportunities to continue disrupting the
environment without this process ever being redressed.
Corporate solutions are false solutions, and will not solve the climate
crisis.
Link to the Grain report
https://www.grain.org/article/entries/5322-how-redd-projects-undermine-peas…
[3]
Follow us on twitter and facebook:
@via_campesina [4] and https://www.facebook.com/viacampesinaOFFICIAL [5]
Also join the global movement with the hashtag:
#PeasantsCoolThePlanet #FoodSovereigntyForClimateJustice #COP21
#FoodSystemChangeNotClimateChange
Links:
------
[1]
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/actions-and-events-mainmenu-26/-climat…
[2] http://viacampesina.org/en/images/2015-12-02-REDD.jpg
[3]
https://www.grain.org/article/entries/5322-how-redd-projects-undermine-peas…
[4] https://twitter.com/via_campesina
[5] https://www.facebook.com/viacampesinaOFFICIAL
Climate: Real problem, false solutions. 2: Agrocarburants [1]
Published on Wednesday, 02 December 2015 10:30
[2]
TO SOLVE THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS, MULTINATIONALS ARE SUGGESTING FALSE
SOLUTIONS. FAR FROM SOLVING THE PROBLEM THEY ARE CONTRIBUTING WITH THEIR
SHARE OF DAMAGES. THIS ARTICLE IS THE SECOND IN A SERIES OF FIVE TO
APPEAR THIS WEEK
_ 2/ Agrofuels_
For those advocates of false solutions, they are known as "bio" fuels.
The goal is to produce something that would have the very worthy benefit
of reducing our dependence on oil, and in so doing lower greenhouse gas
emissions, through the creation of energy derived from plants, a
limitless resource by all accounts, which is certainly not the case with
fossil fuels!
_Really?_
The truth is that producing agrofuels involves the use of vast swathes
of agricultural land at the expense of food production. Thousands of
hectares of fertile land once destined to provide nourishment are
repurposed, jeopardising local populations' right to food sovereignty.
Furthermore, the expulsion of peasant farmers from these lands,
occasionally by violent means represents a denial of people's dignity
and rights.
As has always been the case, land is being sought everywhere, now the
decision has been made to fell the trees of the Amazon and elsewhere.
The destruction of these areas, often recognised as major carbon sinks,
leads to significant CO2 emissions.
Add to that a means of ultra-intensive agriculture, heavily reliant on
chemical input, well so much for "bio"…
Lastly, the food crisis of 2007-2008 and the food riots they triggered,
brought things into sharp focus: agrofuels put intense pressure on food
product prices, and multinationals have wasted no time in sizing up the
potential rewards. With a notably large presence in this market is the
French company Sofiprotéol-Avril managed by Xavier Beulin (President of
France's largest agricultural union).
Links:
------
[1]
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/actions-and-events-mainmenu-26/-climat…
[2] http://viacampesina.org/en/images/2015-12-2-agro-carburants%20en.jpg
Climate : Real problem, false solutions. 1. GMOs [1]
Published on Monday, 30 November 2015 23:43
TO SOLVE THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS, MULTINATIONALS ARE SUGGESTING FALSE
SOLUTIONS. FAR FROM SOLVING THE PROBLEM THEY ARE CONTRIBUTING WITH THEIR
SHARE OF DAMAGES. A BRIEF OVERVIEW FOLLOWS. THIS ARTICLE IS THE FIRST IN
A SERIES OF FIVE TO APPEAR THIS WEEK.
According to those who promote them, they are a wonderful dual-power
technology. To start with, GMOs would have the ability to slow down
climate change by: reducing the use of pesticides, which constitute a
significant source of Green House Gases when they are produced and used;
and by reducing tillage, which releases carbon emissions. What's even
better is that GMOs would allow us to have plants that resist droughts
and floods, which therefore adapt to climate change!
REALLY?
In fact, GMOs' tolerance to one (or many) herbicides or insecticides
quickly develops resistance and makes plants adapt, which leads to many
unwanted plants and pests appearing in fields. You therefore have to use
even more pesticides to get rid of them!
Regarding the issue of no-tillage, it doesn't make any sense and doesn't
have an impact if it is carried out using an industrial agriculture
approach; which favors systems that don't use crop rotation and where
herbicides are widespread. In Argentina, no-tillage using Monsanto's
Round Up Ready soya beans has destroyed hectares of meadows and forests,
therefore needing carbon sinks.
Adapting to climate change is the ultimate decoy. It is genetic
complexity and rich natural biodiversity that allows nature to adapt,
not its destruction!
GMOs belong to an industrial agri-food system that patents living
beings, monopolizes peasants' knowledge, halts and destroys peasant
agricultural practices and the whole chain significantly releases Green
House Gases and is devastating for the climate. So it is a great way to
make profit off climate change whilst despising peasants!
Links:
------
[1]
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/actions-and-events-mainmenu-26/-climat…
La Via Campesina struggle against femicide and violence against women
[1]
Published on Wednesday, 25 November 2015 18:40
[2](Harare, November 25, 2015) On the International Day for the
Elimination of Violence Against Women on November 25th, La Vía Campesina
will be mobilizing to strengthen the struggle and resistance around our
capitalist, patriarchal system. Taking into account how this system
endangers the lives of women, how it treats them as objects, how it
exploits women and removes them from their homes, creates wars and
militarizes civilian territories, it is urgent to build new human
relationships that are founded on gender justice and equal rights.
La Vía Campesina is reaffirming its commitment to the "Global Campaign
to End Violence Against Women" undertaken in 2008 as a tool for debate
and education within the peasant movement. Additionally, it aims to call
out the structural violence in society that threatens women around the
world. This violence manifests itself in every arena, including the
physical, psychological, economic and the political one and it is
reinforced daily as if it were something natural and normal.
This year, standing together as La Vía Campesina, we raise our voice in
opposition to all forms of violence and oppression while bringing
attention to the global increase in femicides. We witness with great
indignation and anger how the current historical conditions created by
the capitalist, patriarchal system promote social practices that permit
attacks on women. This happens both in the city and countryside,
regardless of social class, political beliefs, religion and age.
In addition to a patriarchal, capitalist society where violence is
normalized and women's bodies are objectified, the lack of legal
protections, breach of laws and lack of public policies worsens the
problem. This creates an insecure living situation for women that puts
lives at risk and promotes impunity and silence. We are being murdered!
Therefore, on this day of action we call on our organizations and our
allies to participate in the World March of Women and ask our friends to
collectively make visible all forms of violence and oppression that
women face. Our goal is to strengthen our collective efforts as well as
our hopes to build a new society based on gender justice and dignity for
everyone.
More information:
Photos and audio: Check Out our New Postcard Collection: No More
Violence Against Women! [3]
Primer: No More Violence Against Women! here. [4]
Video: No More Violence Against Women! [5]
Links:
------
[1]
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/main-issues-mainmenu-27/women-mainmenu…
[2]
http://viacampesina.org/en/images/2015-11-25-No%20Violence%20against%20wome…
[3] http://tv.viacampesina.org/Cunas-Radiales-Basta-de-Violencia?lang=es
[4]
http://viacampesina.org/downloads/pdf/sp/Cartilla_Basta_de_Violencia_contra…
[5] http://tv.viacampesina.org/Basta-de-violencia-contra-las-72?lang=es
HUMAN RIGHTS
SYNGENTA CONVICTED IN BRAZIL [1]
Published on Thursday, 19 November 2015 23:37
[2]
JUSTICE FINDS COMPANY RESPONSIBLE FOR ARMED ATTACK ON ENCAMPED RURAL
WORKERS.
The court sentence, given by Judge Pedro Ivo Moreiro, of the 1st Civil
Court of Cascavel, was published in the Paraná State Official Gazette
this Tuesday (17). The sentence rules that the company shall pay
compensation to Keno's family and to Isabel for the moral and material
damage it caused. The case was taken to court in 2010, as an attempt to
get a response from the State regarding Syngenta being responsible for
the attack perpetrated by private armed militia.
The sentence has been well received by social movements and human rights
organizations, since making companies accountable for human rights
violations is a challenge of global dimensions. "Transnational companies
currently have considerable freedom to operate on a transnational basis,
but there are no national or international norms or mechanisms
sufficient to oblige companies to respect human rights or to hold them
accountable for cases of human rights violations. In this case, Syngenta
having been found responsible is an exception to the rule", explains
Terra de Direitos' lawyer, Fernando Prioste, who has been accompanying
the case.
ABOUT THE SENTENCE
The judge found that the fact that took place on Syngenta's property
was nothing less than a massacre. In his sentence the judge states that
"to refer to what happened as a confrontation is to close one's eyes to
reality, since […] there is no doubt that, in truth, it was a massacre
disguised as repossession of property". The version put forward by
Syngenta was thus rejected by the Judiciary Branch. The company claimed
that the attack that took place in 2007 was the result of a
confrontation between militiamen and members of Via Campesina.
In its defence, Syngenta acknowledged the illegality of the action of
the private militia, as well as the ideological nature of the action
against Via Campesina and MST. The company stated that "more than
protection of farm properties, it is clear that the militia's objective
was to defend an ideological position contrary to that of the MST
[Landless Rural Workers' Movement], so as to propagate the ideia that
every action results in a reaction." With this statement the
transnational company attempted to avoid its responsibility, claiming
that the attack was not made by the company it hired, but rather by
militia acting on the orders of landowners.
Notwithstanding, in his sentence the judge recognized that the "bad
choice in outsourcing security services, as well as the indirect funding
of illicit activities, is a factor that generates civil liability".
Moreover, the judge vehemently condemned the attack by stating that
"however reproachable and illegitimate the occupation of the property
may have been, nothing justifies taking the law into one's own hands,
imposing the death penalty on the occupants, rather the legal means for
resolving the conflict should have been sought since, after all, the
legal system considers the arbitrary exercising of one's own judgements
to be a crime". As such the court sentence not only reaffirms the
ideological nature of the militia's action, but also links Syngenta with
that action.
The court sentence is not definitive. Syngenta, through its defence
lawyer René Ariel Dotti, can appeal to the Paraná State Court of
Appeals. In the view of Terra de Direitos' lawyer, Fernando Prioste, the
Appeal Court is expected to maintain the sentence in order to
re-establish the truth about what happened in October 2007. "There is
strong evidence against the company", he notes. "If Syngenta were to be
absolved this would be tantamount to the justice system acquiescing to
massacres like the one that occurred in this case".
EXCEPTION TO THE RULE
[3]When asked about the sentence, Isabel Nascimento dos Santos said she
was pleased, much more than merely because of the financial
compensation. Seriously injured during the attacked idealized by
Syngenta in 2007, the rural worker highlighted the court's recognition
of the company's guilt in the case.
"Now I can hold my head up, and try to forget a little of the suffering
we've faced. Is the battle over? Never! We shall carry on, continuing
Keno's work as well".
Eduardo Rodrigues, MST representative in the Cascavel region, stresses
the importance of the sentence. According to him, the impunity of large
companies that violate rights is common, and at the same time the
movement's members are frequently criminalized for their struggle in
opposition to the agribusiness model. "The attack did not take place
unbeknown to the multinational company", the farm worker denounces.
"They not only provided institutional support, but financial and
logistic support as well."
Eduardo hopes that this sentence will be extended to other cases in
which companies will be held accountable for the attacks they commit. "I
hope this sentence will strengthen our struggle, giving visibility to
our companions".
The many obstacles existing to ensure that companies respect human
rights and are held accountable for the violations they commit, have
lead the United Nations Organization (UN) to discuss the establishment
of a binding international treaty creating prevention, redress and
accountability mechanisms with regard to the issue of companies and
human rights.
The UN working group on the establishment of an international treaty
regarding companies and human rights will visit Brazil in December. It
is expected that the UN representatives will use case convicting
Syngenta as a reference for holding accountable large companies that
commit human rights violations through outsourced companies.
ABOUT THE CASE
On October 21st 2007 around 40 gunmen from the "NF Segurança" company
attacked the Via Campesina encampment located at Syngenta's genetically
modified food experiment site at Santa Tereza do Oeste (PR). The site
had been occupied once more that morning by around 150 members of Via
Campesina and the Landless Rural Workers' Movement (MST).
The occupants were denouncing illegal experiments on genetically
modified corn in a protective boundary zone of the Iguaçu National Park.
Via Campesina members were also seeking to denounce biotechnology
companies that work so as to impose a farming model that causes
environmental harm through the use of genetically modified crops and
pesticides, making it infeasible for self-employed rural workers,
indigenous peoples and traditional communities to produce healthy
foodstuffs.
Heavily armed NF Segurança militiamen invaded the site firing their guns
towards the people who were occupying it. According to information
provided by Via Campesina, the attack had been arranged by Syngenta
which used NF Segurança's services, together with the Western Region
Rural Society (SRO), and the Rural Producers' Movement (MPR), which has
links with agribusiness. There are signs that the security company was
going to be closed down and that it hired security guards illegally to
perform attack operations. In addition to Keno, the gunmen shot and beat
up Isabel and injured a further three farm workers.
With a 19% share of the agrochemical market and the third highest
profits from seed sales worldwide, coming only after Monsanto and
Dupont, Syngenta, along with other transnational companies, exacerbates
the scenario of rural violence by imposing a farming model based on
monoculture, gross exploitation of farm workers, environmental
degradation, use of pesticides and private appropriate of natural and
genetic resources.
The Valmir Mota de Oliveira ("Keno") Agroecology Research Centre has
been set up in the area where the facts occurred.
>> Find out more about the case [4]
>> Terra de Direitos has developed guide [5] on the issue of making companies accountable for human rights violations, to assist with assessing possibilities of taking legal action against companies on the international level.
Links:
------
[1]
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/main-issues-mainmenu-27/human-rights-m…
[2] http://viacampesina.org/en/images/Syngenta%20Condenada.png
[3] http://viacampesina.org/en/images/Keno.jpg
[4] http://terradedireitos.org.br/2013/03/02/syngenta-parana/
[5]
http://terradedireitos.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Guia-transnacionai…
“PEASANT AGROECOLOGY FOR FOOD SOVEREIGNTY AND MOTHER EARTH, EXPERIENCES
OF LA VIA CAMPESINA”. NOW AVAILABLE! [1]
Published on Monday, 09 November 2015 23:47 Our Solutions to the COP21
- New Notebook La Via Campesina
[2]TITLE: "Peasant Agroecology for Food Sovereignty and Mother Earth,
experiences of La Via Campesina"
SUMMARY: La Via Campesina is pleased to present study booklet number 7:
"Peasant Agroecology for Food Sovereignty and Mother Earth, experiences
of La Via Campesina", which is the result of the collective efforts of
various organizations from diverse regions including Africa, America,
Europe and Asia. These groups make up part of our worldwide movement.
>From their distinct territories they shaped their experiences in
agroecology training, organizing, production and marketing of healthy
foods into 10 articles. This set of experiences represents a dynamic
range of practices and knowledge, both for training within our movement
and as a mechanism for additional knowledge exchange and rural-city
dialogue.
This book also seeks to provide visibility of advocacy for Food
Sovereignty which creates space for reflection, with examples from
academic institutions, political allies and friends. We propose Peasant
Agroecology as a way of production for rural communities, where Food
Sovereignty constitutes a principle of life.
DATE: November 2015
LANGUAGE: English (Also available in Spanish and French)
EDITING: La Vía Campesina
DOWNLOAD HERE. [3]
Links:
------
[1]
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/publications-mainmenu-30/1899-peasant-…
[2]
http://viacampesina.org/en/images/Afiche%20Pub%20Agroecologa%20English.jpg
[3]
http://viacampesina.org/en/images/stories/pdf/CUADERNO%207%20LA%20VIA%20CAM…
Silence the Guns, Stop the Killings! [1]
Published on Thursday, 29 October 2015 18:16
(Turkey, October 29, 2015) We peasants are the ones who watch over a
plant as it comes into leaf and grows tall; who plant seeds, seedlings
and saplings in the earth; who are filled with joy when we observe their
healthy progress; who lose sleep when they fall sick; who care for our
animals like our children.
Yet now, we are losing sleep over events in the Middle East and Turkey,
we are following developments with great concern. Why? Because war
strikes small farmers first. Peasants are being forced to abandon their
villages and land. Peasant families are not only losing their land, but
also their lives, and they are being forced to migrate. Forests are now
being destroyed, the water is being polluted and nature faces ruin.
Each new dawn brings more news of massacres. News of massacres in Turkey
have been added to the already devastating news of massacres in Syria
and Iraq.
In June, a bomb exploded in Suruç the midst of a gathering of young
people who wanted to take some toys to children in Kobanî, and 33 of
them lost their lives. Instead of finding and capturing the perpetrators
of the Suruç Massacre by the government, we observe an increasing of
police operations targeting progressive and democratic forces. Young
people are dying: It makes no difference whether they are soldiers or
civilians, Kurdish or Turkish. The peace process has now been declared
to have been put "on ice". The policies of the current government are
dividing the people in Turkey along lines of race, nationality and
religious denomination. Every single social demand, every step for
democratic progress is being stifled under oppression.
The AKP government and the President have failed to accept the outcome
of the June 7, 2015 general election, taking advantage of
anti-democratic laws and legal loopholes. The formation of a new
government has been blocked; and the President has announced a new snap
election.
Then, bombs exploded on 10 October in the midst of a peace rally that
opposed the policies that rapidly polarize the country and lead to a
civil and international war. The rally aimed to raise the voice of peace
over war and was organized by DISK (Confederation of Revolutionary Trade
Unions), KESK (Confederation of Public Workers Unions), TMMOB (Union of
Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects), and TTB (Turkish Medical
Association). Dozens of mass organizations, including Çiftçi-Sen, and
left political parties supported the rally. According to official
figures, 97 peace defenders were murdered and 400 were injured in the
capital city of the country in front of the eyes of the state
authorities.
In light of recent events, we demand that the international community
and everyone across the world who cares for justice and peace put
pressure on the AKP government and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to
abandon their policy of war and anti-democratic practices to Silence the
Guns and Stop the Killings!
_Çiftçi-Sen (Small Farmer Unions Confederation in Turkey)_
Links:
------
[1]
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/main-issues-mainmenu-27/human-rights-m…